Debate — Multi-Agent Discussion Orchestrator

Overview

Trigger a structured debate among Xiaoyin's advisory agents. Each agent brings a different perspective and they argue/counter each other in sequence.

Available Agents

All registered agents can participate. The user decides which ones to include. Common participants:

| Agent | ID | How to Include |

|-------|-----|---------------|

| Strategist | strategist | sessions_send strategist |

| Coach | coach | sessions_send coach |

| Devil | devil | sessions_send devil |

| Investor | investor | sessions_send investor |

| Creator | creator | sessions_send creator |

| PM | pm | sessions_send pm |

Debate Formats

Quick Round (Default)

When user says "debate [topic]" or "what do you all think about [topic]":

1. Send the topic to all 5 council agents simultaneously:

   sessions_send strategist "DEBATE ROUND 1: [topic]. Give your perspective in 3-5 sentences. Be direct and take a clear position."
   sessions_send coach "DEBATE ROUND 1: [topic]. Give your perspective in 3-5 sentences. Be direct and take a clear position."
   sessions_send devil "DEBATE ROUND 1: [topic]. Give your perspective in 3-5 sentences. Be direct and take a clear position."
   sessions_send investor "DEBATE ROUND 1: [topic]. Give your perspective in 3-5 sentences. Be direct and take a clear position."
   sessions_send creator "DEBATE ROUND 1: [topic]. Give your perspective in 3-5 sentences. Be direct and take a clear position."
   

2. Collect all responses.

3. Present as a formatted roundtable:

   ## Council Debate: [Topic]
   Strategist:
   [response]
   Coach:
   [response]
   Devil:
   [response]
   Investor:
   [response]
   Creator:
   [response]
   ---
   Where they agree: [summary]
   Key tension: [the most interesting disagreement]
   

Deep Debate (2 rounds)

When user says "deep debate [topic]" or "argue about [topic]":

Round 1: Same as Quick Round.

Round 2: Send each agent a summary of all other agents' positions:

sessions_send strategist "DEBATE ROUND 2: Other agents said:
Coach: [summary]
Devil: [summary]
Investor: [summary]
Creator: [summary]
Counter the strongest opposing argument in 3-5 sentences."

1v1 Duel

When user says "have [agent1] and [agent2] argue about [topic]":

Selective Council

When user mentions specific agents: "@strategist @investor what about [topic]"

Synthesis

After every debate:

1. Identify points of agreement (likely safe bets)

2. Identify the sharpest disagreement (where the real decision lies)

3. Present the trade-off clearly — do NOT recommend a side. Let her decide.

Cost Awareness